¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ °æ¿µ¿¬±¸¼Ò

·Î°í & ¹Ù·Î°¡±â

¸ÞÀθ޴º

ÄÁÅÙÃ÷ ³»¿ë ½ÃÀÛ

¿¬±¸È°µ¿

³í¹®
Kim, Tae Hyun, ±è¿ø¼Ò,¹®¼º¾Ï,¹Ú¼¼ÈÆ.  ¼ö¿ä±Þº¯ ½ÃÀÇ Àç°íÁÖ¹® ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ :Á¦ÇÑµÈ ÇÕ¸®¼º °¡Á¤À» ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î  Çѱ¹SCMÇÐȸÁö  9  : 123~134
¹ßÇ¥³âµµ: 2009  |  ºÐ¾ß: ODI
Extant studies on inventory decision making with rational-men assumption have focused on finding an optimal order quantity. However, in most social science fields, bounded rationality assumption has recently been emerging as more realistic assumption. Based on this research trend, some inventory studies turned their interest toward inventory ordering behavior with bounded rationality assumption. This research also gears its foundation to that assumption, and takes inventory ordering behavior in a sudden demand change situation. If inventory manager is rational, he or she will show the same amount of response to the same quantity change only with opposite change direction. This study, however, set hypothesis of asymmetric ordering contrary to that of classical economic assumption. The authors believe that this research will contribute to extend the understanding of the current inventory studies with the expectation of improving practical ordering performance.

ÄÁÅÙÃ÷ ³»¿ë ³¡

¿¬¶ôó ¹× ÀúÀÛ±Ç

ÆäÀÌÁö ·Îµù À̹ÌÁö Ç¥½Ã

ÆäÀÌÁö ·ÎµùÁß ...

ÆäÀÌÁö ·ÎµùÁß ...

x
x