¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ °æ¿µ¿¬±¸¼Ò

·Î°í & ¹Ù·Î°¡±â

¸ÞÀθ޴º

ÄÁÅÙÃ÷ ³»¿ë ½ÃÀÛ

¿¬±¸¼¾ÅÍ

ESG/±â¾÷À±¸® ¿¬±¸¼¾ÅÍ

ESG/±â¾÷À±¸® ¿¬±¸¼¾ÅÍ´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº È°µ¿À» ¼öÇà ¹× °èȹÇÏ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

  • ESG°æ¿µ, ±â¾÷Áö¹è±¸Á¶ ¹× Business Ethics ¿¬±¸
  • ESG °¡Ä¡Æò°¡, SROIÆò°¡, ȯ°æÃ¥ÀÓÅõÀÚ Æò°¡Ã¼°è ¿¬±¸ ¹× ÀÚ¹®
  • Socially Responsible Investment(SRI) °ü·Ã ¿¬±¸ ¹× ¼¼¹Ì³ª
  • ÀΰøÁö´ÉÀ±¸® ¹× ÀÚÀ²ÁÖÇàÀÚµ¿Â÷ÀÇ À±¸®Àû À̽´ ¿¬±¸ ¹× ¼¼¹Ì³ª
  • ¿µ¸® ¹× ºñ¿µ¸®±â°üÀÇ ³»ºÎÅëÁ¦ ¹× ³»ºÎ°¨»ç °ü·Ã ¿¬±¸
2018 Academy of Management Annual Meeting ³í¹® ¹ßÇ¥
µî·ÏÀÏ: 2018-09-27  |  Á¶È¸¼ö: 1,057

Áö³­ 8¿ù ½ÃÄ«°í¿¡¼­ ¿­¸° 2018 academy of management  annual meeting¿¡¼­  "CEOs’ Debt-Based Compensation and CSR. Its effect on Risk and Performance"ÀÇ Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î  Andres Guiral ±³¼öÀÇ ³í¹®ÀÌ ¹ßÇ¥µÇ¾ú´Ù.

Abstract :

We bridge the debt based compensation discourse with stakeholder agency literature to explore the consequences of debt relative to equity based pay for multiple stakeholders, including employees, community, customer, debtholders and shareholders. We argue contractual mechanisms that create long-term debt obligations to the CEO result in better outcomes for multiple stakeholders. Also, such outcome favors the reduction of risks and the improvements in long-term performance, particularly in situations of financial distress. This suggests that inside debt deserves more attention from governance scholars and boards who are attempting to incentivize a longer-term multi-stakeholder orientation

 Link

ÄÁÅÙÃ÷ ³»¿ë ³¡

¿¬¶ôó ¹× ÀúÀÛ±Ç

ÆäÀÌÁö ·Îµù À̹ÌÁö Ç¥½Ã

ÆäÀÌÁö ·ÎµùÁß ...

ÆäÀÌÁö ·ÎµùÁß ...

x
x